🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.